Striving for ProfundityThese days, everyone wants to be an intellectual.
About this Entry
Posted by: anathaniel

Visit anathaniel's Xanga Site

Original: 3/22/2008 10:30 AM
Views: 93
Comments: 5
eProps: 6

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site


Who gave the eProps?
2 eProps!2 eProps! 2 eProps from:
craigellachie
nequam_lacuna
tskerritt


Saturday, March 22, 2008

What of Kinism?

 Does anyone remember the uproar caused on these message boards by a few fringe Reformed laypersons when they presented their beliefs to us? It seems like whatever momentum they caused they have since lost. Also, it has ended not with a bang, but with whimper.

For those of you who don't know what Kinism is, it's (to put it simply) the belief that God has mandated that each race of man be separate from one another. Kinists attempt to demonstrate this by interpreting the Babel narrative to mean that if all races of man united, they would do so under one ideology and attempt - in a Promethean feat of strength - to usurp God's rightful place as Lord over creation. God prevented this by confusing their languages and dispersing them their separate ways - and what God hath put asunder, let no man unite.

While Kinists are adamant about not being "racists", the evidence indicates otherwise.

First, most of them exist in a faction within southern Presbyterianism who believe that the Confederacy, which represented the pinnacle of Western Civilization, should be tangibly restored. They justify this through historical revisionism (e.g. "slavery wasn't all that bad"). Two questions come to mind when I hear this: first, if slaves were treated so well, why did so many of them flee to Canada using an "underground railroad" for fear of being caught? Second, if the Confederacy was indeed the feat of enlightened statecraft the Kinists say it was, why did it last for only four years? Why could they not get any other country in the world to recognize them? Surely this would be a simple task for the greatest country on Earth.

Second, they say that while all races "have a right to exist", the white race has a sole claim to building and maintaining civilization, and the extent to which it is diminished within society is directly proportional to the decline of civilization and ultimately the devolution of the human species itself. Thus, the "white race" represents humanity's conscience. One can only conclude from this that this race has a divine right of kingship over every other. How one could conclude otherwise is beyond me.

Anyway, I'm glad that Kinism has not spread beyond the lunatic fringe who endorse it. I'm glad it has bucked the trend of heresies spreading far, wide and deep before they are expunged.





 Posted 3/22/2008 10:30 AM - 93 Views - 6 eProps - 5 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

5 Comments

Visit craigellachie's Xanga Site!
<> I've known some Kinists, and they are frightening. Nor do I think they've stopped spreading their 'gospel'-- I think they're just waiting for a better day and teaching their families to do the same. Like evil seeds, they'll sprout again.
Posted 3/22/2008 1:12 PM by craigellachie - reply

Visit nequam_lacuna's Xanga Site!

From what I've heard about the kinist (bowel)movement, there was sort of an internal breakdown (shocker!).

"Second, if the Confederacy was indeed the feat of enlightened statecraft the Kinists say it was, why did it last for only four years?"

The South really did carry a godly heritage. Slavery was not "common"...it was the primarily the very wealthy that owned slaves...and there were godly Presbyterians that sought to include them in worship on Sundays and held their "owners" responsible for not allowing them Christian education (Stonewall Jackson would be an interesting man for you to google...learning about him caused me to take a second look at the history I had been taught my whole life).

I'm obviously not a kinist, but I do think there's been a lot of revisionist history about the South...not difficult to understand, they did lose the war (and before anyone accuses me of being racist or pro slavery...realize that I'm against man-stealing...which is what American slavery was...and I only see 2 races that exist: the seed of God, and the seed of Satan).

Posted 3/22/2008 6:23 PM by nequam_lacuna - reply

Visit anathaniel's Xanga Site!
I've known some Kinists, and they are frightening. Nor do I think they've stopped spreading their 'gospel'-- I think they're just waiting for a better day and teaching their families to do the same. Like evil seeds, they'll sprout again.

The idea that any of those people have the brains to actually "plot" anything is laughable. Nevertheless, point taken.

From what I've heard about the kinist (bowel)movement, there was sort of an internal breakdown (shocker!).

Not that I care, but you've piqued my curiosity. What precisely happened?

The South really did carry a godly heritage. Slavery was not "common"...it was the primarily the very wealthy that owned slaves...and there were godly Presbyterians that sought to include them in worship on Sundays and held their "owners" responsible for not allowing them Christian education (Stonewall Jackson would be an interesting man for you to google...learning about him caused me to take a second look at the history I had been taught my whole life).

I've read a little bit about Jackson myself and I don't doubt that he was a Christian. I don't even doubt that Christians existed within the upper echelons of the Confederate ranks. As a whole, however, their society was based on having the "right" to exploit other human beings whose race they felt was inferior to their own. Even though the South's economy was agrarian (compared to the North), and essentially forced to lower production costs as much as humanly possible in order to compete not only with the North but internationally, the use of slaves as a means did not justify that end. Had they chosen to invest in capital equipment, they could have potentially caught up with the North and maybe even surpassed them (never mind that - they could have simply pursued a policy of free trade with the North). Their need for slaves would no longer have been necessary and the Civil War could have been averted. Of course, this is entirely speculative and irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Besides, we'll never know for sure.
Posted 3/22/2008 11:48 PM by anathaniel - reply

Visit tskerritt's Xanga Site!
Very well put.
Posted 3/23/2008 4:28 PM by tskerritt - reply

Visit nequam_lacuna's Xanga Site!

"Not that I care, but you've piqued my curiosity. What precisely happened?"

I forget exactly...believe it or not, I rarely think of them ;) Seems like there were just some interpersonal issues...they now have an Eastern Orthodox guy writing for them who defended the pederaste activities of the Greeks...and he is a racist...I know as much because he tried hanging out with me and the Paleocrat when we'd share coffee and pipes...at the time, Paleo was still a Calvinist...and this guy said he thought Paleo was a good guy...but his marriage was some sort of a mongrel marriage seeing that his wife is Asian.

Anyway...there's little sense in talking about Kinists...they're rather boring...and can't exegete themselves through a comic book if their lives depended on it.

Posted 3/24/2008 10:49 PM by nequam_lacuna - reply


Choose Identity
(?)
 
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)



Back to anathaniel's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in anathaniel's local time zone:
GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)